Improving Oratory Skills: An “American Idol” Presentation Competition for Residents
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Grant Review: American Idol or Big Brother?
ess, opting for a version of our current anonymous manuscript review system by eliminating face-to-face contact of reviewers would only serve to widen the error bars among reviews. Moreover, eliminating the face-toface discussions of study sections would have no effect on decreasing the submission-to-score time as reviews are due ?5 days before the study section meets. This is clearly not the b...
متن کاملAmerican Idol: Evidence on Same-Race Preferences
This paper examines whether viewers of the popular television show, American Idol, exhibit racial preferences. We find evidence on same-race preferences among black viewers only; when there are more black contestants in the show, more black viewers are tuned in to watch it. The finding is robust after we account for the endogeneity problem regarding the contestants’ racial composition, which ar...
متن کاملThe Anonymous American Idol Manuscript Reviewer
annoyances for reviewers include required registration as government contractors: a lengthy, two-step application process that requires additional follow-up phone calls requesting to be removed from junk email lists, as well as annual re-registration. Moreover, reviewers are now forced to make travel reservations on the cheapest nonrefund-able tickets, entailing additional personal expenses if ...
متن کاملAmerican Idol and NIH Grant Review
Peer review is an essential part of identifying scientific projects worthy of NIH funding. An Analysis article in the June 2, 2006 issue of Cell (Bonetta, 2006) highlighted the fact that six years after the reorganization of the NIH integrated review groups, further streamlining of NIH grant peer review is still needed. The NIH is well aware of the problems related to the peer review process, a...
متن کاملAmerican Idol and NIH Grant Review—Redux
Michele Pagano’s provocative Correspondence discussing ways to improve NIH grant review contains points that deserve additional consideration (Pagano, 2006). In the spirit of “fair and balanced” reporting (to use an expression of the TV network that the article references), I would like to offer an alternative view. There is no doubt that the NIH grant submission and review process is time cons...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cureus
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2168-8184
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3049